Tuesday, October 13, 2026

Fox News RSS Feed

School had just let out in Marble Hill, a small enclave of Manhattan bordering the Bronx. It was a little after 4 p.m. on Oct. 8 when Oscar Belgal, 28, picked up his five-year-old son and began backing his Honda CR-V into a parking spot on a crowded street.

A police camera caught what happened next. Two men dressed in plain clothes approached Belgal’s SUV with their guns drawn – one to the driver’s side, the other to the front. They were ICE officers. More agents were part of the operation, and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani later noted that officers surrounding the vehicle wore construction vests and masks.

Belgal responded by pulling the SUV forward out of the space. As he did, one officer punched and broke the driver’s window, but Belgal managed to drive off and out of the camera’s view.

FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKS DEPORTATION OF DOMINICAN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT SHOT BY ICE DURING NYC ARREST ATTEMPT

The ICE officers caught up with Belgal about a block away. According to ICE officials, Belgal refused orders to exit the vehicle, turned his SUV into a weapon, and rammed two government cars. Belgal's defense attorney disputes this account, maintaining that Belgal fled out of panic to protect his child from unidentified, armed men. Initial NYPD street camera footage did not capture the moment of the shooting, but investigators later determined that a bullet went through Belgal's windshield. At least one officer fired seven rounds, striking Belgal in the neck below his left ear. His son, sitting in the back seat, was not physically hurt.

The FBI, Homeland Security investigators, and the Bronx District Attorney’s office have all launched inquiries into the shooting.

MAMDANI CALLS ICE A 'ROGUE' AGENCY AFTER NYC SHOOTING, CLAIMS AGENTS VIEW LAW AS 'MERELY A SUGGESTION'

But there is a second story here, one that reveals where we are as a nation.

Within hours of the shooting, Oscar Belgal was no longer a man, an individual. He became a symbol. And the people who made him into a symbol did so by taking away the very thing that makes a man a man: responsibility for what he does.

First, Belgal was not a stranger to the justice system. In 2023, according to a criminal complaint, he was driving with two passengers in his back seat when he turned, pointed a gun at them, and demanded their jewelry. They complied. Belgal pled guilty and received five years of probation. In December 2025, he was indicted on ten counts related to narcotics distribution; he pled not guilty and was released on supervised conditions. Federal officials state that he is in the country illegally and allege that he has ties to the Trinitarios gang. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin has stated that when ICE previously attempted to arrest him in September, Belgal fled.

When New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch laid out that record, the reaction from the left was not to weigh it. Instead, its leading figures declared all of Belgal’s criminal history irrelevant. 

ELI STEELE: THE TERROR OF BEING CALLED RACIST IS CRUSHING FREE SPEECH IN AMERICA

Darializa Avila Chevalier, a Democratic Socialists of America candidate for Congress in New York's 13th District, went on Hasan Piker's stream to talk about the shooting. When Piker asked about Belgal's criminal history, she said, "To me, it doesn't even matter." She then turned her wrath on Tisch and accused her trying to "villainize Oscar." She demanded her resignation. Then she asked the audience to "put yourself in Oscar's shoes." Masked men were coming at his car and "You're running," she said. "I'm sorry, you're protecting your child." She ended with "F--- ICE and abolish it."

What struck me was her moral outrage. She was outraged that stating a man’s record in a matter of fact way was now the equivalent of "villainizing" him. All that mattered to Chevalier was that he was a immigrant, a Dominican like her, a member of an oppressed group, and that he was being chased by men with guns who were ICE.

In my new film, "White Guilt," my father, Shelby Steele, the author, columnist and Hoover Institution Fellow, shows how the left created a world where responsibility can never be demanded of the oppressed. He describes going to a Black Power rally on the South Side of Chicago to hear the comedian and activist Dick Gregory:

"Gregory argued that a racist America had given us responsibility, but had denied us the freedom to do much with it," my father says in the film. "Gregory held a Marxian vision of racism as a systemic force that made responsibility irrelevant in the struggle against oppression. Thus, it was bad manners to ask a black to lift themselves up."

MAMDANI DEMANDS TRUMP RELEASE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT SHOT BY ICE AGENT AS PROTESTS ERUPT IN THE BRONX

Then Lyndon Johnson stood up at Howard University and said, you do not take a man hobbled by chains, bring him to the starting line and tell him he is free to compete. "By implication, Johnson agreed with Gregory," my father says. "Suddenly, if you were black living in this new age of white guilt, you could not be expected to carry the same responsibilities as others."

The belief Gregory preached and Johnson blessed, that oppression made responsibility irrelevant, became one of the core tenets of the white guilt racial order we live under today. White guilt is not the guilt a person feels for something he did. It is not personal, which is why I tire of hearing people declare, "I have no white guilt." 

White guilt is the collective guilt that the left assigns to all Whites for America's past racial sins. What it produces is not remorse but terror, the terror of being called a racist and losing your moral authority. To escape that terror, the "oppressor" buys back his innocence by asking nothing of the "oppressed," and the "oppressed" are handed power so long as they remain victims. That is how responsibility became "bad manners," in the words of my father, and demanding accountability became racism.

HOCHUL BOASTS 'I JUST BANNED IT' AS NEW YORK OUTLAWS LOCAL POLICE PARTNERSHIPS WITH ICE

Today the "oppressor system" is America itself, and ICE is its face. And what the formula needs most is a symbol.

Activists like Avila Chevalier dehumanize the oppressed by stripping away their responsibility and accountability, then wield what is left as a cudgel against the oppressor system. Once Belgal's record was erased, all that remained was an immigrant father shot by ICE with his little boy in the car. Between them, Avila Chevalier and Mayor Zohran Mamdani demanded that ICE be abolished, the police commissioner resign, Belgal be released and immigration enforcement halt across the city. They did not demand anything of Oscar Belgal.

The DSA often calls itself the party of the people, but listen to how it talks about the people it claims to defend. Its words for them are almost always the oppressed, the victims, and the impoverished. Their value to the movement is not their individual humanity but what they collectively symbolize. If the DSA draws its power from these symbols of oppression to milk White guilt, why would it ever surrender this power?

There is one innocent in all of this: the five-year-old boy in the back seat. His mother says he has nightmares and won’t speak despite his talkative nature. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

The young boy will grow up with two stories of that fateful afternoon. In one version, his father will be seen as a victim, nothing more, and the world owes him. In the other story, his father is an individual who made choices, some of them bad, and yet has the chance to improve his life somehow. It is the second story that gives the young boy a real chance at life.

Belgal’s lawyer said the first thing that his client asked was whether his son was OK. This detail reveals to us that Oscar Belgal is a man with a conscience, and a man with a conscience can bear responsibility for his choices.

The same lawyer said that "regardless of whether or not someone has a criminal history, it is not lawful and it's not okay to shoot a father." The investigations will decide whether the shooting was lawful. And due process which protects all individuals within this country, including those who are not citizens.

So let the courts judge the officer who fired, and let them judge Oscar Belgal too. Avila Chevalier would cry that this is villainizing him. Those who believe in American principles would call it treating him like a man who is responsible for his own life.

The activists will never allow it. Their power in White guilt America depends on keeping Oscar Belgal a permanent symbol of oppression.

But what good has ever come out of dehumanization?

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM ELI STEELE



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/yw5ElIc
via IFTTT

Fox News RSS Feed

Catholics serving in the Army should request to be excused from participating in the planned firing squad execution of a convicted Fort Hood mass shooter, which the Pentagon has proposed livestreaming, a prominent U.S. archbishop who oversees Catholic pastoral services for the military said on Monday.

Archbishop Timothy Broglio raised several objections to the Pentagon's unprecedented plan to broadcast the execution of Nidal Malik Hasan, a former Army psychiatrist who was convicted of killing 13 people and wounding 32 others in a 2009 shooting at the Fort Hood military base. Hasan, now 56, uses a wheelchair, after being shot by responding officers during the attack.

Hasan is set to be executed at Fort Hood on Dec. 3, at 1 p.m. CST, according to the U.S. Army, which would make him the first person to be executed by firing squad by the U.S. military since 1945. It would also mark the first U.S. military execution by any method since 1961. Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth said he wanted soldiers to execute Hasan at the time, day of the week and location of the shooting and has argued that making the execution public would help serve as a deterrent.

Broglio recalled presiding over the funeral of one of Hasan's victims, Michael Grant Cahill, the only civilian killed in that attack, and expressed sorrow over the deadly shooting. But the archbishop questioned whether the U.S. government wanted to "imitate the terrorists of this world and make a public spectacle of barbarically killing our adversaries."

POPE LEO DENOUNCES DEATH PENALTY AS 'INADMISSIBLE' AHEAD OF PENTAGON'S PLANNED LIVESTREAMED EXECUTION

Hasan's crime "was heinous, but does exposing the public to his execution serve any purpose?" Broglio asked in a statement.

"I oblige any Catholics assigned to the firing squad to request to be excused from this action contrary to the teaching of the Church," he continued.

Army regulations permit soldiers to seek religious exemptions or accommodations.

It is unclear how the military intends to select members for the firing squad.

"The U.S. military generally enjoys a good reputation in the world," Broglio said. "Is there really a value to throwing them in the same boat with terrorists by broadcasting the image of the execution of a man in a wheelchair to the whole world?"

A U.S. government execution has never been broadcast to the public, making it an unprecedented plan that has drawn backlash from political and religious leaders. 

Broglio joins other Catholic leaders in criticizing the Pentagon's plans to livestream the execution.

The head of the U.S. bishops conference, Archbishop Paul Coakley, expressed "shock" and "great sorrow" about the public execution plan and urged the U.S. to reconsider.

"In no way can Hasan’s actions be condoned but this decision is a barbaric promotion of a culture of death and must be reconsidered," he said in a statement on Friday. "The public execution even of one who has done grave harm will only further undermine the moral fabric of our nation and be a blight on the conscience of its people."

Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican secretary of state, called the proposed broadcast "truly incomprehensible" and warned that it was "unacceptable to turn death into a spectacle."

"The Church’s position is one of total opposition to the death penalty; it is incompatible with human dignity and serves as no deterrent," Parolin told reporters on Friday. 

According to the English translation published by Vatican News, Parolin said, "It is truly incomprehensible that anyone would want to use this method in this day and age. I do not know for what purpose. It is certainly unacceptable to turn death into a spectacle. However guilty the person may be, there are other ways."

Parolin added that the death penalty "is incompatible with human dignity and does not serve as a deterrent."

Pope Leo XIV reiterated the Catholic Church's opposition to the death penalty as "inadmissible" in a social media post on Saturday marking World Day Against the Death Penalty. 

Citing Catholic doctrine revised under his predecessor, Pope Francis, Leo emphasized that the death penalty violates human dignity.

"The death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person. The common good can be safeguarded and the requirements of justice can be met without recourse to capital punishment: effective systems of detention have been developed that protect citizens while at the same time do not completely deprive those who are guilty of the possibility of redemption," Leo, the first American pope, wrote on X without specifically mentioning the Pentagon's execution plan for Hasan.

FORT HOOD SHOOTER SHOULD BE EXECUTED '13 TIMES OVER' — BUT NOT ON LIVE STREAM, SURVIVOR SAYS

President Donald Trump said Saturday he had not yet decided whether to allow the livestream plan to move forward, although he has reportedly expressed doubts in private about broadcasting the execution.

Vice President JD Vance, who is a Catholic, expressed skepticism about whether the Pentagon would proceed with a public execution. He said he would not watch the livestream if it were carried out.

Several lawmakers, including Republicans, have spoken out against plans to broadcast the execution.

"Public executions are what oppressive dictatorships like Iran and Afghanistan do," Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said on Thursday. "It should not be happening in America."

Reuters contributed to this report.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/lkhBIOs
via IFTTT

Monday, October 12, 2026

Fox News RSS Feed

With less than a month until the midterms, everyone has suddenly become an expert on Texas and Michigan.

I understand why.

Texas has Texas state Rep. James Talarico, the charismatic Democrat trying to do something Democrats have dreamed about for decades: turn Texas blue. He is running against former attorney general Ken Paxton, a Republican carrying enough political baggage to fill the overhead bins on a 747.

FOX NEWS POLL: IT’S A LONE STAR SENATE SHOWDOWN BETWEEN TALARICO AND PAXTON

Michigan has Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed. Whatever you think of his progressive politics, he is a rare political talent: charismatic, compelling, and very good at attracting attention. His race against former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers has become one of the most closely watched contests in America.

Watch them both.

FOX NEWS POLL: MICHIGAN VOTERS SPLIT BETWEEN EL-SAYED AND ROGERS

But if you want to understand what is actually happening in this election, I'd look somewhere else.

I'd look at Iowa.

FOX NEWS POLL: TUREK, HINSON IN CLOSE IOWA SENATE RACE

Because Iowa doesn't come with quite the same political celebrity. It doesn't have the irresistible "Texas turns blue!" storyline. It doesn't have Michigan's unusual mix of personalities and politics.

It just has an extraordinarily close Senate race. And that may make it a much better test of the country.

DEMOCRATS ARE WITHIN STRIKING DISTANCE IN THE SENATE, BUT SHOULDN'T CELEBRATE YET

Democratic state Rep. Josh Turek and Republican Rep. Ashley Hinson are separated by essentially nothing. The RealClearPolitics polling average has Turek at 45.9% and Hinson at 45.2%.

Less than one point.

12 RACES SCRAMBLE SENATE BATTLEFIELD AS DEMOCRATS EYE COMEBACK

Fox found Turek ahead by two. The New York Times/Siena found Hinson ahead by one. Suffolk University has Turek ahead by four.

Pick your poll. The conclusion is basically the same: Iowa is up for grabs.

LEE CARTER: POLLS SAY DEMOCRATS COULD SWAMP REPUBLICANS. AS A POLLSTER, I HAVE A QUESTION

And that should get our attention.

Because something much bigger than one Senate seat is happening underneath these numbers. Americans aren't simply unhappy with Republicans.

DAVID MARCUS: IN DAYTON, OHIO, BOTH PARTIES FACE BITTER POLITICAL DESPONDENCY

They're unhappy with everybody.

A new AP-NORC poll found only about two in 10 registered voters believe either political party is focused on helping people like them.

Think about that.

After billions of dollars in advertising, thousands of speeches, endless cable-news appearances and approximately 47 million fundraising texts asking if I personally hate America because I haven't chipped in $7 yet, eight out of 10 voters still aren't convinced either party is particularly interested in them.

That's not a blue wave.

That's a giant flashing WARNING sign for the political establishment.

Yes, Democrats have improved their position. They now hold an advantage on the issue that may matter most: cost of living.

But even there, more than a quarter of voters say they trust neither party to handle it.

That is the story of 2026. Not love. Not loyalty.

Disappointment.

And disappointment makes elections unpredictable.

We've become accustomed to treating politics like tribal warfare. Red states. Blue states. MAGA voters. Progressives. Everyone neatly sorted into their corners. Except voters don't seem particularly interested in cooperating with our categories this year.

They are angry about prices. They're exhausted by politics. They're skeptical of institutions. And a striking number don't believe either party knows how to fix the problems they encounter every day.

That is why Iowa matters.

President Donald Trump carried Iowa comfortably in 2024. Republicans should not have to spend the final weeks of a midterm wondering whether they can hold a Senate seat there.

But they are.

And Democrats shouldn't interpret that as evidence that America has suddenly fallen in love with them, either.

It hasn't.

Voters appear to be shopping. And when voters are shopping, candidates matter more. Turnout matters more. Mistakes matter more.

And individual votes matter a lot more.

That's why I'm reluctant to join the chorus declaring a blue tsunami four weeks before Election Day.

Could Democrats have a very good night? Absolutely. The polling gives them plenty of reason for optimism. But elections aren't held in polling averages.

They're held by actual people who decide whether getting in the car, standing in line and filling out a ballot is worth the trouble. And this year an awful lot of those people don't particularly like either option.

So yes, watch Texas.

Watch Michigan.

Watch the charismatic candidates and the political celebrities and the races that generate the best television.

But watch Iowa.

Because if you want to know whether this election is really a wave, or something far messier and closer, Iowa may tell us first.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

And if you're one of the millions of Americans looking at both parties and thinking, You've got to be kidding me? Go vote anyway. Especially this year.

Because in an election where so many voters are dissatisfied, disengaged and undecided, your vote may count for a whole lot more than you think.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM LEE CARTER 



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/VFfgiKJ
via IFTTT

Fox News RSS Feed

It’s like watching some sci-fi game with players competing on 470 different fields. Which is your basic definition of crazytown. No human being, without mainlining AI into his or her arm, could possibly track so many contests, so we bounce from one race to the next, with buzzers and bells, like a pinball machine. 

Look! Charlie Cook is moving 18 House races in the Democrats’ favor! This is o-vah! The blue wave is getting stronger. Put a cork in this one, it’s done!

But wait a minute. The Republicans have a huge cash advantage. Big-time Democratic donors, for whatever reason, are sitting on their checkbooks. Don’t they realize the stakes? Are they all blinded by the sun on their private islands?

There seems to be a consensus, even privately among Republicans, that the Dems will take the House. The only question is the margin.

So we all wind-surf across the Senate race, even if we know little more than what we read that morning in Politico, or the New York Times or Wall Street Journal. 

The GOP just sent another $30 million to Ken Paxton, the Texas Republican who has more baggage than a 747. (Being impeached by your own party doesn’t help.) He was caught on audio saying "everybody’s numbers dropped" after President Trump’s midterm convention. Even Trump calls him "a pain in the *ss sometimes." And this is the guy they want to win?

DEMOCRATS THINK A BLUE WAVE IS BUILDING. HERE ARE 3 FORCES THAT COULD STOP IT

His Democratic opponent, James Talarico, went into hiding–what’s up with that? Turns out he had a nasty case of the flu. Still, it’s Texas, the Lone Star State, where Democratic dreams go to die.

Okay, we’re starting to get vertigo. In Maine, is this the year Susan Collins gets knocked off? One poll has her trailing by four points against Democrat Troy Jackson, who replaced weirdo candidate and Nazi tattoo-wearing Graham Platner, who quit after a sexual assault allegation. What a lovely business.

Republicans have a president who’s polling in the low 30s, which perhaps explains why he was campaigning the other day in Syracuse, when New York is among the bluest of blue states.

The Democrats need a net gain of four seats to control the Senate, and while some are prematurely sipping Champagne, nobody really knows if they can draw that kind of inside straight. If they tell you they do, they’re lying. 

MICHIGAN SENATE DEBATE ERUPTS INTO PERSONAL ATTACKS AS ROGERS, EL-SAYED CLASH OVER ISRAEL, IRAN AND MORE

There’s a harsh spotlight on the Michigan Senate race, featuring Democratic socialist Abdul el-Sayed vs. former congressman Mike Rogers. I eagerly watched their high-decibel debate the other night–okay, I was assigned to it--and here’s my takeaway.

El-Sayed won on points–he’s just a smoother and more aggressive debater than Rogers, who looks like a classic pol–and every third sentence was an attack on Trump or the war. This put Rogers at a disadvantage, because he supported the Iran war but now says it should end.

And El-Sayed kept whacking Rogers for owning two yachts, which is sort of irrelevant.

Rogers called his opponent a "con man" and kept trying to tie him to the Muslim Brotherhood. This was a weakness for el-Sayed, who was asked whether he’d send aid if Israel was attacked, and insisted that he’d rather spend the money here at home.

El-Sayed also did a lousy job of defending Medicare for All and why it wouldn’t bring the end of private insurance. Since Michigan is near the border, both men came out against Canadian tariffs–a flip for Rogers–in a noisy segment that was utterly indecipherable to mere mortals.

The whole thing turned into an interrup-ta-thon, with the moderator constantly scolding the contenders.

Aren’t you glad you missed it? Now, thanks to yours truly, you can pretend you saw the debate.

But enough about the midterms. Time to join the punditocracy and speculate about 2028.

Kamala Harris is leading the ridiculously early polls, with a quarter of the Democratic vote.

There’s just one problem. Her husband, the Wall Street Journal reports, has privately told people he doesn’t want her to run. How’s that for a vote of confidence?

So bite your nails, everyone. The fate of the free world, both sides are warning, hangs in the balance.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/u8g0OE3
via IFTTT

Sunday, October 11, 2026

Fox News RSS Feed

The suspect accused in the ambush killing of a Philadelphia police officer was arraigned Sunday morning on 76 charges and ordered held without bail, according to court records.

Eric Lewis, 35, faces charges including murder, homicide of a law enforcement officer, attempted murder, 10 counts of attempted homicide of a law enforcement officer, aggravated assault, terroristic threats and other related offenses. His next court date is scheduled for Oct. 26.

The charges stem from a Saturday shooting that killed Philadelphia police Officer Shane Seiber and left his partner wounded.

Seiber, 40, was a father of two and an Air Force veteran who served 10 years with the Philadelphia Police Department. He is survived by his wife, 7-year-old son and 3-year-old daughter.

PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER KILLED, PARTNER SHOT 12 TIMES IN AMBUSH; SUSPECT FOUND HIDING IN TREE

"He fought valiantly, but he lost his life today," Police Commissioner Kevin Bethel said at a news conference on Saturday. "His wife was able to be by his side before he passed, as well as his family."

The wounded officer, a 33-year-old father of five, was shot 12 times and was initially listed in critical condition. He has since been listed in stable condition.

The shooting unfolded around 12:20 a.m. Saturday, when the two officers responded to a report of a man with a gun. They located an armed man on a porch, according to police.

KENTUCKY TROOPER, FATHER OF 3, GUNNED DOWN DURING TRAFFIC STOP AS SUSPECT CAPTURED AFTER MANHUNT

The officers then came under "significant gunfire" after reaching the porch, police said.

Additional officers and a SWAT team arrived a short time later and found both officers on the porch suffering from gunshot wounds.

More gunfire followed, prompting authorities to declare a barricade situation before Lewis was eventually taken into custody, according to police.

Police said Lewis was found in possession of two handguns and a shotgun. One of the handguns belonged to an officer wounded in the attack.

At a news conference Saturday, District Attorney Larry Krasner declined to say whether Lewis had fired the officer's handgun or how he had obtained the other firearms.

Krasner also said there was nothing in Lewis' criminal background that would have prevented him from obtaining a firearm.

Lewis, an employee of the Philadelphia Water Department, has a criminal history dating to 2012, according to Pennsylvania court records reviewed by Fox News Digital.

Court records show Lewis was convicted of theft and receiving stolen property in 2012 and of gun-related offenses and simple assault in 2013. He received probation in both cases.

In 2018, Lewis pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct involving fighting and was again sentenced to probation.

Records also show Lewis received three traffic citations in 2024, including driving without headlights, failing to provide proof of insurance and a windshield-related violation.

Fox News' James Cirrone, Brittany Miller and CB Cotton contributed to this report.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/sB289cI
via IFTTT

Fox News RSS Feed

The Justice Department has charged 64 foreign nationals across 17 states with unlawful voting, fraudulent voter registration and election-related offenses in roughly the last five weeks, according to figures provided to Fox News Digital, as federal prosecutors intensify election-integrity enforcement.

Minnesota leads the nation with 11 defendants, followed by Pennsylvania with 10 and Texas with nine. Louisiana accounts for five, while New Jersey, California and Florida each have four, according to the department's latest tally.

The nationwide crackdown comes as federal officials intensify scrutiny of voter-registration safeguards ahead of November's midterms, with recent elections underscoring how even a few illegal ballots can exceed the margin separating candidates. Fox News Digital mapped the states with the largest concentrations of defendants as DOJ says it has charged 104 people with voting fraud-related offenses since Trump returned to office in 2025.

SKID ROW FORGERIES, ILLEGAL VOTES AND A MAYORAL CANDIDATE: ELECTION FRAUD CASES PILE UP NATIONWIDE

"Every illegal vote cancels out the vote of a lawful American citizen. In 2020, Iowa's 2nd Congressional District race was decided by six votes," a DOJ spokesperson told Fox News Digital, referring to Republican Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks' narrow victory over Democrat Rita Hart.

DOJ said federal prosecutors are bringing more than twice as many election-fraud cases each week as the six-vote margin in the Iowa race.

NIGERIAN WOMAN IN MASSACHUSETTS CHARGED AFTER ALLEGED ILLEGAL VOTING IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS

The spokesperson added: "Voting by noncitizens and other ineligible voters is a federal crime, and the department will enforce the law whether a case involves one illegal ballot or hundreds."

The cases involve allegations ranging from fraudulent registration applications to ballots cast in multiple elections.

The department is also securing guilty pleas in some cases, including against Filipino national Evelyn Miller of Emmaus, Pennsylvania.

Miller pleaded guilty to illegally voting in the 2024 presidential election and faces up to one year in prison and a $100,000 fine.

MORE THAN A QUARTER-MILLION NONCITIZENS MAY BE REGISTERED TO VOTE IN 4 KEY STATES, DHS ALLEGES

"We intend to prosecute anyone who corrupts our democracy by illegally voting in its elections," U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania David Metcalf said.

Also in Pennsylvania, federal prosecutors charged Haitian national Cliff Sanon with submitting a fraudulent voter registration application in Philadelphia County. Prosecutors allege he submitted eight registration applications and voted in the November 2022 election.

BLANCHE ANNOUNCES CHARGES AGAINST 10 PERMANENT RESIDENTS ACCUSED OF MINNESOTA VOTER FRAUD

In Minnesota, Ghanaian green card holder Joshua Kofi Edzie was charged with illegally voting in the state's August 2026 primary and falsely claiming U.S. citizenship in connection with voter registration.

The prosecutions have also reached Republican-led states, including Texas, Louisiana and Florida, which account for 18 defendants combined in the DOJ figures provided to Fox News Digital.

In Louisiana, the feds indicted an ex-mayoral candidate on a charge of voting by an alien. Bridget Johnson, who ran in 2024 to lead Cotton Valley, Louisiana, allegedly submitted a registration in the name of Jamaican national Michael Wedderburn and falsely swore he was a citizen. Wedderburn then allegedly voted illegally in 2024 for president and mayor. He was also recently indicted.

In New Jersey, Republicans have pointed to several razor-thin elections amid a separate controversy involving approximately 6,600 people who indicated they were not citizens but were erroneously registered through the state's Motor Vehicle Commission. Fewer than 400 subsequently voted, according to Gov. Mikie Sherrill's administration.

Former Englewood Cliffs Mayor Mario Kranjac recently highlighted municipal elections in Caldwell, Atlantic Highlands and Bogota decided by margins of four to six votes in 2023.

SIGN UP TO GET THE POLITICS NEWSLETTER

The state has not established that any of the affected voters changed an election outcome. Sherrill spokesman Sean Higgins previously said the governor "moved with transparency and accountability to remediate this error from 2023."

The prosecutions come as federal officials continue scrutinizing voter-registration safeguards ahead of November's midterm elections. Authorities have not established that any of the cases identified in DOJ's nationwide tally changed the outcome of an election.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/9boiFem
via IFTTT

Fox News RSS Feed

As California grapples with soaring Medi-Cal costs — including billions spent on healthcare for immigrants without legal status — Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic lawmakers have backed a revised health-plan tax in response to new federal restrictions, a move critics warn could shift more costs onto privately insured Californians.

The tax has united an unlikely coalition of doctors and health insurers against him, with critics warning it could make California even more expensive.

To preserve billions in Medi-Cal financing after Washington tightened the rules governing health-plan taxes used to draw federal matching funds, Newsom backed a redesigned tax that would raise the levy on private health plans beginning in 2027 if federally approved, potentially increasing premiums for their customers. Providing healthcare to illegal immigrants cost California an estimated $12.4 billion in 2025, the Associated Press reported.

When asked if expanding coverage to illegal immigrants created a need for California to raise taxes, Brian Blase, president of the right-of-center Paragon Health Institute, answered with a strong "yes."

DR. OZ UNVEILS MEDICAID OVERHAUL, CLAMPS DOWN ON $2B FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS AND MANDATES WORK FOR ABLE-BODIED

"The One Big Beautiful Bill Act limited California's ability to target the tax just on Medicaid insurers, so California is proposing to raise the health insurance tax on people that have private coverage ... the estimates are that would increase insurance for families by $400 a year," he told Fox News Digital. "That is just because California doesn't want to deal with its unsustainable spending ... there are many people on the program who are not eligible for the program, and that is not even accounting for the fact that California has expanded Medicaid to all unauthorized immigrants in the state."

California's attempt to shore up Medi-Cal's bottom line follows federal changes that will prevent the state from continuing its existing health-plan tax structure after 2026, forcing a redesign of a financing mechanism that has generated billions of dollars for the program.

The California Medical Association and California Association of Health Plans are suing to block the tax increase, not on the grounds that it benefits illegal immigrants, but over allegations that the measure violates voter-approved limits on health-plan taxes and restrictions on how the resulting revenue can be spent. The duo uniting to challenge the tax is notable because doctors and insurance companies often find themselves on opposite sides of healthcare debates.

Proposition 35, the initiative in question, limits how much California can tax commercial health-plan enrollment, constraining the state's options as it tries to comply with new federal rules governing the much higher tax previously imposed on Medi-Cal enrollment. The proposition was passed with overwhelming support from Californian voters.

NEWSOM BEGS CALIFORNIANS TO VOTE 'NO' ON BILLIONAIRE'S TAX IN FACE OF MASS EXODUS, PITCHES NATIONWIDE TAX HIKE

"California voters passed Proposition 35 and made it law. The state does not get to ignore that law simply because following the law is inconvenient," California Medical Association CEO Dustin Corcoran said in a statement.

Health insurers warn the cost of the revised tax could be passed directly on to consumers through higher premiums, estimating an increase of about $100 per person per year. A family of four, for example, could face an additional $400 annually on top of normal rate increases.

Newsom spokeswoman Tara Gallegos said that the governor maintains that his tax increase is not rendered illegal by the proposition.

"The state disagrees with their claims, and we believe the courts will too," she told Fox News Digital of the lawsuit.

H.D. Palmer, deputy director for external affairs at the California Department of Finance, explained to Fox News Digital that the new tax measure was designed to comply with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. According to Palmer, the state's current health tax regime may conflict with the bill and that the state is submitting a proposal with two tracks — one that is similar to the current taxing scheme but might run afoul of federal law and another that conforms to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act by shifting costs toward private plans.

CALIFORNIANS FLEEING TO RED STATES ARE DRIVING UP HOME PRICES AND RENTS IN THEIR NEW CITIES, DATA SHOWS

"If the federal government declines to approve the tax that is structured similar to the existing [health plan tax], Proposition 35 may then sunset per current law," he added.

California has faced a mass exodus of people and businesses over the past decade, with the cost of living being one of the chief reasons individuals cite for leaving the Golden State. One analysis found that almost 10 million people moved from California to other states between 2010 and 2024, while just over 7 million moved to California from elsewhere in the country during the same period.

The state’s exodus has raised concerns about its financial outlook, with the departure of higher-income residents potentially reducing tax revenue for a state heavily dependent on income taxes.



from Latest & Breaking News on Fox News https://ift.tt/n7FLOGP
via IFTTT